Jesus’ use of “ears to hear” statements are not restricted to the letters to the seven churches in Revelation, but are sprinkled throughout the record of the Gospels. The first instance is in Matthew, and we hear Jesus saying “The one who has ears had better listen!” (11:15) He says this while speaking about John the Baptist, and in the wake of saying “From the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven has suffered violence, and forceful people lay hold of it” (11:12), and then goes on to reference John as Elijah. Following the “ears to hear” statement, Jesus continues to speak about John, as well as the Son of Man, and then goes on “to criticize openly the cities in which He had done many of His miracles, because they did not repent” (11:20).
Perhaps most importantly, Jesus’ words about needing to hear, which are connected with John, are uttered in the context of His already saying in reference to whether or not He was the “one who is to come” (11:3), “The blind see, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the poor have good news proclaimed to them” (11:5a). With these words, Jesus is speaking to the expectations of the people concerning the coming of the messiah, when their God would act on Israel’s behalf and bring the age of His kingdom to pass. Jesus seems to be saying that the long-awaited kingdom has arrived with Him, as evidenced by the seeing, walking, cleansing, hearing, raising, and the Lord’s being set on high as king (the Gospel proclaimed), but that it has arrived in an unexpected way, and that John the Baptist, owing to all appearances, was certainly an unexpected forerunner of that kingdom (he is Elijah, who is to come-11:14b).
One would have to have ears to hear Jesus talking about the arrival of the long-awaited kingdom of God, because for a variety of reasons (political, religious, social, economic) Jesus could not simply announce that God was now present and working through Him. A flat announcement could have the effect of either derailing His ministry from the path that He intended, through the stoking of nationalistic and revolutionary tendencies that Jesus clearly wanted to avoid, or it could result in His own untimely death (which He wanted to put off until the right moment). The ones with ears to hear would not only need to draw out the kingdom-present implications from what Jesus has said before, but would also need to connect that with the “Son of Man” references that would follow shortly thereafter, and Jesus’ reference to that Son “eating and drinking” and being “a glutton and a drunk, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!” (11:19b) This, of course, does not necessarily mean that this was true of Jesus (though focusing on this would be missing the point), because it is possible that Jesus was making a reference to the rhetorical polemic that had been used against John and would also be employed against Him.
Going beyond that, Jesus’ listeners would need to stay tuned to what He was saying, when He goes on to say that “All things have been handed over to Me by My Father. No one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son decides to reveal Him” (11:27). With the implicit talk of the advent of God’s kingdom that has come before, coupled with the reference to the Son of Man that He had already made, the astute listener would be able to find Jesus making reference to the ever-so-popular imagery of the seventh chapter of Daniel, in which “one like a son of man…went up to the Ancient of Days and was escorted before Him. To Him (son of man) was given ruling authority, honor, and sovereignty. All peoples, nations, and language groups were serving Him. His authority is eternal and will not pass away. His kingdom will not be destroyed” (7:13-14). Jesus was clearly addressing the people in a way that makes it clear that they needed to understand a fact of their present situation, which is what we have proposed for the letters in Revelation in general, and the letter to Laodicea quite specifically.
No comments:
Post a Comment