David now goes on to say “He reached down from above and
grabbed me; He pulled me from the surging water” (2 Samuel 22:17). Is
this not what God did for His people Israel? David continues: “He rescued
me from my strong enemy, from those who hate me, for they were too strong for
me” (22:18). This too is what God had done for Israel, in rescuing them
from Egypt, and effectively overthrowing their empire with the waters that had
represented His love and mercy for Israel. Undoubtedly, Egypt was not
going to be overcome by any attempts towards such ends by Israel, for Egypt was
far too strong. Ironically, much of their strength was owing to what the
God of Israel had done for Egypt through Joseph, though this had been long
since forgotten.
To what might David have been referring when he uses these
words? To a lion, to a bear, to a giant, to a king, to a son, to a
general? It could be any or all of these things, as David says “They
confronted me in my day of calamity, but the Lord helped me” (22:19). As
we have taken a good deal of time examining David’s life, we are not stretching
the truth if we are to posit that his life moved from one calamity to the next,
a fair number of which (but not all) he brought upon himself. This cannot
be said of Israel in Egypt, as the Scriptures do not give us any indication
that the calamity of their oppression in Egypt was something that they had
secured through their own doings. Rather, what we do know about Israel’s
sojourn in Egypt is that it was a part of the fulfillment of God’s promises to
Abraham, that would prove His covenantal faithfulness to those who knew
themselves to be descendants of Abraham. However the calamitous
circumstances came about, there would be no doubt that the latter part of
Israel’s Egyptian experience, along with the initial portions of its exodus
experience, could be reckoned by both David and the people to be situations of
calamity in which the Lord must intervene in order for there to be a positive
outcome.
After speaking of his calamity, David goes on to say, “He
brought me out into a wide open place; He delivered me because He was pleased
with me” (22:20). This too, God did for Israel, and it could be applied
and understood in multiple ways, though it, in context, is most likely still
making reference to the crossing of the sea on dry land. God brought His
people through the waters of calamity, rescuing them from their quite strong
enemy, bringing them through the narrow passage walled by waters to their left
and right (here, we can make an allusion to the “valley of the shadow of death”
in the twenty-third Psalm), and setting their feet on solid ground on the other
side of the sea, with the long-awaited promise of their inheritance of land set
before them. Moses would say “By Your loyal love You will lead the people
whom You have redeemed; You will guide them by Your strength to Your holy
dwelling place… You will bring them in and plant them in the mountain of your
inheritance, in the place You made for your residence, O Lord, the sanctuary, O
Lord, that Your hands have established” (Exodus 15:13,17). With boldness,
David declares that the salvations (exodus, redemption, deliverance, rescue)
that he had experienced, and which he attributed to the powerful hand of the
Lord working on his behalf, was evidence that the Lord was pleased with
him. We do not find the same thing being said of Israel in Egypt, though
we do hear God instructing Moses to inform Israel that “I am the Lord. I
will bring you out from your enslavement to the Egyptians, I will rescue you
from the hard labor they impose, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm
and with great judgments. I will take you to Myself for a people,
and I will be your God. They you will know that I am the Lord your God,
Who brought you out from your enslavement to the Egyptians” (6:6-7).
Clearly, God was redeeming a people whose purpose was His pleasing.
So what we see happening here, as we have carefully reviewed
the exodus event in connection with David’s song, is David’s attempted
undertaking of the embodiment of Israel. Not only is he placing his story
within, and intimately connecting it to Israel’s history, but he is also
attempting to define himself as Israel. With these words, David, along
with the author, wants the people to identify his trials with nothing less than
what Israel had experienced in Egypt and in their coming out of Egypt. It
is quite the piece of propaganda, indicating that David has learned well from
his experiences. David, quite clearly, wants the people to see him as a
Moses figure, which had been successfully undertaken by Absalom. If the
people did, in fact, identify David with Israel, and his overcoming of
calamities with the same power that God had put on display on behalf of Israel,
against Egypt, then just as Israel “feared the Lord, and they believed in the
Lord and in His servant Moses” (Exodus 14:31b), then so too would they believe
in him. By this, David would be elevated alongside Moses as the greatest
figure in the history of the nation.
This embodying of Israel, by their king, in which he becomes
their representative before the Lord, will carry significant weight in
determining God’s future dealings with his nation. It would also come to
be quite crucial in Jesus’ own understanding of Himself and His role as
Israel’s king, as we can certainly justly see Jesus seizing upon these words of
David’s song that we have reviewed, as well as those to come. Just as
Adam, the first king of humanity, was representative of all humanity, so now
David explicitly positions himself as the representative of the people that saw
themselves as God’s new humanity, who were being charged (in the line and light
of the Abrahamic covenant) to represent the Creator God and to bless all
nations accordingly by reflecting the light of His glory into the world.
Jesus will adequately take both of these roles upon Himself, representing
Israel and all of humanity before the cross, and representing the new humanity
(the people of the kingdom of God which points to the renewed and restored
creation) following the Resurrection.
No comments:
Post a Comment