In Jesus’ day, the
Roman cross was the symbol of Rome’s power of death over the lives of its
subjects. It was an instrument of terror
and domination. Because Israel was still
in subjection to a foreign power, they still correctly considered and
understood themselves to be in exile and under their God’s cursing. Thus, the cross, and it’s use against members
of the Jewish populace, was an incredibly stark reminder of the curse of
covenant failure.
In the twenty-eighth
chapter of Deuteronomy, for violations of His covenant with them, the Creator God
promised to His people to “raise up a distant nation against you, one from the
other side of the earth as the eagle flies” (28:49a). Now, numerous
nations had carried the eagle as a symbol, and the eagle was also the symbol of
Rome’s Senate, its people, and of imperial Rome. It is said that
approximately twenty years prior to Jesus’ birth, King Herod the Great placed
an eagle, in deference to Rome, over an entrance to the Temple. For
multiplied reasons, not the least of which was the fact that it reminded the
people of Rome’s domination (and therefore their God’s cursing) as well as
passages such as that of Deuteronomy above, this mightily offended large
numbers of the people of Israel.
So through an
understanding of the power of Rome and the cursing that was part of Israel’s
narrative that was symbolized by the cross, along with the eagle in conjunction
with Rome’s military might, as well as the Psalmist’s insistence in regards to
rescue from a hostile army, one can make a realistic analysis and
re-construction of Jesus’ mindset as He considered His role in regards to the
establishment of the kingdom of heaven, on behalf of His people and the
world.
While Jesus did not
rise up to conquer Rome (as many in His day expected of Israel’s messiah), by
being raised up from the dead after having been put to death on the Roman
cross, He was rescued from that which represented the oppressive subjection of
the world’s power, which was the cross. Not only that, it must also be
said that Jesus went directly into that which His own people saw as a
representation of being accursed by God, which was being hung on a tree (a
cross), that He traversed death in the grave, and that he came out the other
side, completely vindicated by the covenant God’s power and faithfulness.
With that vindicating
Resurrection from the grave clearly in mind, the Apostle Paul, also operating
under the influence of messianic ideas and the inspiration of the Psalms and
the prophets according to the historical narrative of the covenant people, writes
that Jesus “was appointed Son-of-God-in-power according to the Holy Spirit”
(Romans 1:4a). This title, of course, was one held by the Caesar. Paul indicates that this man, Jesus, that had
been subject to a violent and gruesome form of death in which the world’s power
clearly overcame Him in a way that was visible to all people, contrary to any
reasonable or rational way of thinking, had come out the other side of death
and was now in the position of true power.
His Resurrection from
the form of death that represented the power of death over life, showed the
world that it was Jesus, and not the Caesar, that now had the power of life
over death. This point is even more
significant when one remembers that it is made in a letter to the believers
that lived under the nose of the one looked to as the son-of-god-in-power. Among a number of other things, this improbably
Resurrection vindicated His claims as Israel’s Messiah. It is with this
in mind that Paul now insists that all that was said to be true of that messiah
throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, must now be said to be true of Jesus.
No comments:
Post a Comment