So, given the
prevailing sense of the “Roman peace” (pax Romana) when Jesus’ disciples arrive
in a village and in a house and say “May peace be on this house,” one can
almost imagine them being met with some trepidation. Again, this is not
un-familiar. It is not difficult to envision the people, as they receive
this greeting, thinking “Great, more peace,” as they entertain what they know
and perhaps have experienced to be Caesar’s notion of peace.
Then, when those same
disciples go out into the public square and begin speaking of the kingdom of the
Creator God that has come upon them (heaven has invaded earth and the Creator
God is ruling the world through the true Son of God, Jesus the Christ of
Nazareth), that message of peace, coupled with kingdom, could very well continue
to invoke thoughts of Rome’s crushing domination and their means of
establishing peace and extending their kingdom. This, of course, is where
attentiveness to the sick comes in as being dramatically important to the kingdom
message, as it was and would never cease to be a distinctive badge worn by the
disciples of the Christ.
Naturally, the
distinction is drawn because the usual, traveling preacher would pay little if
any attention to the sick, as there would be almost nothing to be gained from
them financially. Similarly, the Caesar
or his representative also cared little to nothing for the sick, as those that
were sick to the point of being an unproductive subject of the empire, could
very well be looked upon as nothing more than a burden that members of the local
populace were all to happy to shift to Rome.
Still, even with the
healing of the sick (conscientiously serving them and attending to their basic
needs so that they might recover their health and so be healed, and this
alongside recoveries that could be described as nothing short of miraculous) accompanying
the message of the rule of the Christ on earth, this preaching of the kingdom
of God that had come, as indicated and proved out by the Resurrection, could
create a natural skepticism and induce a “here we go again” attitude amongst
the populace, as they would be fully cognizant of the Caesar’s methods that
would be meted out to those that rejected the message.
In this light, what is
it that Jesus tell His disciples? He says, “whenever you enter a town and
the people do not welcome you, go into its streets and say, ‘Even the dust of
your town that clings to our feet we wipe off against you’.” (10:11a)
This was a different approach. This was certainly not a calling down of
fire. Far from it. When heard within the appropriate context, it
hardly even sounds like the invoking of a curse. Where Caesar would have
whetted his sword with blood (which would then need to be wiped off) and left
men, women, and children lying in the dusty streets for their rebellion in
rejecting him, Jesus suggests a different though significant, symbolic
action.
No comments:
Post a Comment