Not only had Jesus been conducted into Jerusalem as its
King, and then said and done some interesting things in connection with the
Temple, but He had also said and done a great number of things prior to that
which had enabled Him to gain a following and a reputation that resulted in
what would come to be referred to as His “triumphal entry” into Jerusalem, and
His being able to act with seeming impunity in the Temple.
The record of Mark’s Gospel prior to Jesus’ words that spoke
of the destruction of the Temple (on the heels of the widow’s unfortunate
offering) have Him enduring Satan’s testing in the wilderness following His
baptism, casting out demons, healing Peter’s mother-in-law, cleansing a leper,
healing a paralyzed man, restoring a withered hand, offering mysteriously
authoritative teaching, calming a storm, restoring a well-known demoniac to
sanity, reversing a woman’s twelve year long ailment, raising a twelve year old
girl from the dead, feeding multitudes, walking on water, providing hearing to
a deaf man, giving sight to a blind man, experiencing a transfiguration
accompanied by Moses and Elijah, and cursing a fig tree so that it withers and
dies.
This is the man---that has done
these amazing works---that now speaks such things about the Temple. He
goes on to speak of the possibility of being mislead, with many coming in His
name, of wars and rumors of wars, of nations and kingdoms rising up in arms
against one another, of earthquakes, of famines, and of pain (13:5-8). It
is then that Jesus speaks of His own disciples experiencing persecution, of
standing before governors and kings on His behalf, of preaching the Gospel to
all nations, of arrest, of the Holy Spirit, of brother rising against brother,
and of children rising against parents. It is to this that Jesus adds
those poignant words, saying “You will be hated by everyone because of My
name.”
Hated? Hate was
not an uncommon disposition in those days. Hate was part of the social
fabric and the contest for honor. Israel
was hated by a variety of people. In turn, Israel offered hate in return---one
can think of the attitude and disgust engendered against the Samaritans in this
regard. In many respects, the hate for and from Israel would center on
Israel’s claims to be the special and chosen people of the covenant God, and
thus stem from the exclusivist positions derived from their understanding of
that claim. Perhaps Jesus’ mention of this hatred because of Him was a
way of communicating to His disciples that they must continue on with some of
the exclusive practices being carried on by the wider citizenry of
Israel?
Of course, in
consideration of Jesus’ wide-open practices in the area of table-fellowship, in
which He welcomed all and sundry to break bread with Him in defiance of custom
and societal norms, such thinking can be dismissed almost immediately.
Thus the high-mindedness with which Israel looked upon themselves, which was a
large part of the reason for which they disassociated from the rest of the
world and therefore became the grounds for mutual hatred, was demonstrably precluded
by Jesus’ active and oft-repeated example.
Yet at the same time
Jesus spoke of His disciples being hated. So how would these disciples
have responded to this? How would they have heard this? To uncover
the answer it is necessary to look into Israel’s history, and especially the
history by which Israel saw itself supremely defined. It must always,
always, always be remembered that even though Jesus was certainly unique in a
number of ways, His teaching and His mission were firmly grounded within
Judaism and the history of Israel.
No comments:
Post a Comment