Naturally, having
heard what was said by Jesus in the fourteenth chapter and the parable that
followed, this mention of the burning desire for places of honor at banquets will
not be lost on Luke’s hearers. They, as should any educated and
culturally aware observer, make the connections. The final nail is driven
into their figurative coffins as Jesus informs His hearers (and Luke’s
hearers), that these experts in the law, “devour widows’ property” (20:47).
They devour widows’
property? This is unconscionable! How do they do this? Is
there evidence of this? Absolutely there is evidence, and Jesus
immediately points His hearers to the evidence as He “looked up and saw the
rich putting their gifts into the offering box. He also saw a poor widow
put in two small copper coins. He said, ‘I tell you the truth, this poor
widow has put in more than all of them. For they all offered out of their
wealth. But she, out of her poverty, put in everything she had to live
on.’” (21:1-4)
For too long this has
been looked upon as Jesus offering a commendation to this widow, as she was
willing to sacrifice all that she had for the Temple as a sacrifice to the
Creator God. However, in light of all that has led up to it, and in the
wake of Jesus’ symbolic judgment against the Temple, it demands to be understood
as a rebuke to the Jerusalem Temple, its system, and all associated with
it. Indeed, when understood correctly, it should be concluded that Jesus
sees the offering of this widow as a tragedy, as her property was completely
devoured by a corrupt system (they devour widows’ property) full of robbers,
which He had already condemned. This becomes especially clear when one rightly
incorporates the idea that Jesus is the true Temple.
This Temple, already
“adorned with beautiful stones and offerings” (21:5b), and its functionaries
(essentially the powers-that-be of the day) should have been lavishing care
upon this poor widow, exercising justice and mercy, rather than taking that which
she could not afford to give. This would have been the proper attitude of
those that were supposed to be representing the faithful and gracious God of
Israel. However, with the portrait of the experts in the law that has
been painted, there is nobody, reading or hearing, that is surprised at what
has just happened, and that this poor widow has had her property devoured.
It is little wonder
then that the remaining mentions of the experts in the law to be found in Luke
take the form that they do. Along with the Temple, Jesus has condemned
them, so it is no surprise to hear that “The chief priests and the experts in
the law were trying to find some way to execute Jesus” (22:2a), that they
played a role in an unjust and illegal trial in which “the council of the
elders of the people gathered together, both the chief priests and the experts
in the law” (22:66), and that “The chief priests and the experts in the law
were… vehemently accusing Him” (23:10). The point, which had begun to be
made in the fifth chapter when Jesus takes up the role of the Temple by forgiving
sins, adding healing to that role, with this immediately questioned by the
experts in the law (their first mention), is that Jesus is the true
Temple. It would seem that Luke wants all to know that Jesus, as the
embodiment of Israel’s God, is the place where the Creator God resides.
No comments:
Post a Comment