…maintain good conduct among the non-Christians, so that
though they now malign you as wrongdoers, they may see your good deeds and
glorify God when He appears. – 1 Peter 2:12 (NET)
The Gospel is inherently
social. Because it is the declaration of Jesus’ Lordship, with this
Lordship being the Lordship not just of individual lives and souls, but over
the whole of the cosmos, it has a social element. This is a far cry from the
Gospel being reduced to a “social gospel,” but rather, it is to say that the
implications of the declaration demand to be worked out in a tangible, visible
way, on display for a society to see.
Just as the worshipers or proponents of the Caesar declared
his lordship, and in doing so were not asking people to make a private
confession of faith in Caesar or to cultivate a personal and private holiness
that would somehow be pleasing to Caesar, neither were the proponents of Jesus
insisting upon such a thing. The Gospel (Jesus is Lord) was and is public.
The reaction to the Gospel (the fact that Jesus is Lord) demanded a community
context. The presentation of Caesar’s gospel (Caesar is lord of all)
resulted in certain activities (the erecting of statues, sacrifices, festivals,
submission to his earthly rule, etc…) that made it clear to all that his gospel
was being accepted, so it would be expected that an alternative Gospel,
especially in that day and age (and of course for all time) would demonstrate
the same.
When the Gospel (Jesus is Lord) was
preached into a world that was accustomed to a regular hearing of a gospel
message (Caesar is lord), it was preached into a world that was prepared to
hear such a message, and it was preached into a world that would have expected
public, community oriented demonstrations of what it was that was being
trumpeted. Yes, the Gospel was and is meant to be transformative. That transformation, of course, is intensely
personal, but that personal transformation was and is to be manifested in positive
public behavior---not simply a negative (i.e. “I don’t do” these things and
neither should you).
That public behavior is not, as is so commonly proposed,
merely that which takes place in church gatherings where singing, praying,
lifting up hands, and giving are taken as the evidences of the inherent power
of the Gospel and of transformed lives. Public behavior is not that which
is primarily concerned with a dramatic abstention from participation in life’s
pleasures, accompanied by thinking that it is by constant refraining and
restraining efforts that holiness is demonstrated.
Those things can certainly be evidentiary, but they are only
the primary evidence if one exalts the individual, rather than the body (and
its Lord), and if one places private spirituality in the context of a personal
quest to achieve heaven upon death higher than offering tangible service as and
for a community (being lights to the world). Such a focus seems to run
counter to the movement of Scripture, in which the Creator God is constantly
calling a people to Himself, beginning with Abraham, so that they might
exemplify divine blessing and be a blessing to the whole of the created order.
Persons are called, and they are called to be a part of a people, for the
primary purpose of being a blessing to the world so that the God that calls
them into covenant might be glorified.
No comments:
Post a Comment