To Him all the
prophets bear witness that everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of
sins through His Name. – Acts 10:43 (ESV)
Forgiveness of sins
is for everyone, with the caveat to that being that it only comes to those who
believe in Him, that being Jesus. What is it that must be believed?
In its most basic form, what must be believed is that Jesus is Lord, that He is
supreme above all other rulers and authorities, and that His Lordship extends
to the whole of creation (human, animal, vegetable, mineral). With the
words of our text, we find that Peter is speaking here to a man named
Cornelius, a Gentile, and presumably, to a group that consisted predominantly
of Gentiles, consisting of “his relatives and close friends” (10:24b).
Peter, of course, is
a Jew, a member of the nation of Israel. Cornelius was a Roman centurion
who lived in Caesarea, and was said to be “an upright and God-fearing man”
(10:22b). In addition to that, he was “well spoken of by the whole Jewish
nation” (10:22c). To that, we can add that he “feared God with all his
household” and “gave alms generously to the people” (10:2b). His being
well-spoken of by the whole Jewish nation is obviously hyperbole, meant to
inform us that the people with whom he dealt on a regular basis were quite fond
of him. This was probably due in part to his giving of alms to the
people. Clearly, he was a shrewd man that knew how to deal with the
people that were, in some sense, subject to his authority.
Owing to all of this,
it is highly likely that Cornelius was familiar with the great, national
aspirations of the people of Israel, their understanding of their plight of ongoing
subjection to pagan rulers, and the continued exile from the promises of their
God that such subjection represented. With that, it is reasonable to
presume that he well understood the way that Israel generally looked upon
Gentiles, which goes back to what had to be one of the main factors in his
generous contribution of alms.
If he did in fact
understand these things, then it is also likely that he had a very basic grasp
on the importance of Israel’s national symbols of circumcision, land, Torah,
and Temple. We must also hold to an idea that Cornelius would be quite
surprised to be instructed to send for a Jew to come to his house, as Jews did
not generally enter the house of a Gentile, and especially the house of a Roman
centurion, who would represent their hated oppressors. Not only would the
instruction be a surprise, we would have to figure that Cornelius would also be
surprised with the fact that Peter did in fact come into his house. This
makes the fact that upon meeting Peter, Cornelius “fell down at his feet and
worshiped him” (10:25b), all the more interesting.
Peter addresses an
obvious sense of relief on the part of Cornelius when he says, “You yourselves
know how unlawful it is for a Jew to associate with or to visit anyone of another
nation, but God has shown me that I should not call any person common or
unclean. So when I was sent for, I came without objection”
(10:28-29a). With this, Peter is, of course, referring to the vision he
had received while on the roof of the house of Simon, in Joppa. In that
vision, Peter heard God say to him, “What God has made clean, do not call
common” (10:15b). When Peter was found by the men that Cornelius had sent
to bring him to Caesarea, he immediately connected the words of God with future
association with Gentiles, so he did not hesitate to answer the request to
come. One has to wonder what happened to this willingness to extend the
fellowship of the Gospel (Jesus’ Lordship over all nations and peoples) when we
find out about his behavior in Antioch, which we learn about in the second
chapter of Paul’s letter to the Galatians.
Returning to the
subject of exile, it must be pointed out that exile was one of the results of
the sin of Israel, and their faithlessness to God’s covenant with them.
When we look through the books of the Hebrew Scriptures that chronicle the
history of Israel, whenever we find the people in subjection to foreigners,
whether in their land or outside their land, they are considered to be in a
state of exile. This exile will always be connected with sin, usually
idolatry. When the people would have the yoke of subjection and
oppression broken, and are either enabled to overthrow those who ruled them in
their own land, or to return to their land (in the case of the Babylonian exile
and the return under the Persians), we find that it was because the people were
said to have repented from their sin, receiving the forgiveness of their
God. So return from exile was equated with the forgiveness of sins.
We can surmise that Cornelius, with all that is said of him, was familiar with
this idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment