Jesus was the place of the overlap of heaven and earth
(which is also the ancient understanding of the Temple---the place where God’s
existence invaded the place of man’s existence), and this was evidenced by His
constant defeat of the forces that stood in opposition to God and God’s
purposes (healings, exorcisms, raising the dead, etc…). The
responsibility to be the place of that heaven/earth overlap was that which
Israel was charged to uphold, but did not. Jesus embodied Israel and
succeeded where there had been failure, and this charge has been passed along
to those that identify themselves as part of God’s family by Jesus’ name
(affirming allegiance to Him, His kingdom, and the tenets of His kingdom
program---bearing the covenant marker of belief in Him).
Paul expects nothing less than that the believing community
model Jesus in succeeding in being the Israel of God, writing “because
those whom He foreknew He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His
Son, that His Son would be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters”
(Romans 8:29). This is not about some foreordained calling of some percentage of
the human population, such that some go to heaven and the rest go to
hell. This is simply not in view, especially as we consider that such
thinking was foreign to Paul’s worldview. It undoubtedly is the case that
not all will embrace Jesus and acknowledge the Creator God through Him, so
there is a group of people that will participate in the kingdom of God during
their lives while others do not. That said, the passage is not intended
to convey information about the final destination of a human soul.
If we trace the context of the passage, its connection to
the exodus of Israel, and its placement within the whole of the letter that
seems to have to do primarily with the family of God and its representation of
the kingdom of God in and for the world, we realize that thoughts about
predestination, in the sense of determining “who’s in and who’s out,” are
simply not on the field. Once we put that out of the way, what we
see---and this seems to be far more appropriate---is that the passage is about
the covenant faithfulness of the Creator God, that faithfulness that is
recorded in the narrative of Israel that runs back to the story of Adam, and
the impetus for the unified covenant family that is composed of all peoples to
take up its role. The passage is about what God is going to do for His
creation, how He has been doing it, how He is going to do it, and about the
people of the covenant getting on board with and participating in that
plan.
God had called Israel His son---His firstborn. Israel,
the groaning people of Egypt (we can’t forget our groaning context), was
foreknown by God as evidenced by the promise to Abraham about His people that
would go into captivity and then come out of captivity. The foreknowing
of God demands to be understood in accordance with the story of Israel.
God’s intention for Israel, whose story and purpose is predicated by God’s
interactions with Abraham, was to set the world to rights, reversing the
failure of Adam, who was looked upon as the son of God, created in His image,
given a covenant responsibility, and failed. Thus, Israel, whom God
foreknew (as established by the narrative that includes promises and prophecies
to Abraham), was predestined (purposed) to succeed where Adam had failed.
Jesus, who pieced together the messianic mission from His
understanding of Israel’s story, along with the wisdom and prophetic
literature, thus establishing the idea of foreknowing and predestination for
Him as well, succeeded where both Israel and Adam had failed. So the
foreknowing of God in regards to Jesus also demands to be understood in
accordance with the story of Israel. The same can also be said for the
church whose mission is foretold and purposed by the Jesus-centered-and-shaped
messianic tale, and which is now tasked with announcing and carrying on the
successes and even the seeming failure of Jesus.
Here, we remember that crucifixion was a mark of decided
failure. However, the Resurrection reverses the seeming failure, making
it possible to understand the cross as the place where Israel’s full cursing
(Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28) is carried out against Jesus as embodied
Israel. Accordingly, the Resurrection tells the covenant community that
embracing the cross, which will mean going to the place of willful experience
of suffering and shame (mimicking Jesus in His “failure”) if it will advance
God’s creation-and-humanity-redeeming kingdom program, and doing so on behalf
of others so as to be the place of the coming together of heaven and earth and
an announcement of the kingdom of God.
Thus, the church (the covenant people of God culled from all
of humanity, not just ethnic or national Israel, who bear the covenant marker
of belief in Jesus), whom God ultimately foreknew in Abraham, was predestined
to be conformed to the image of Jesus, reproducing a family of divine
image-bearers. It is with this purpose clearly in mind that we then hear
Paul say “And those He predestined, He also called; and those He called, He
also justified; and those He justified, He also glorified” (8:30). Paul
believes that according to the Scriptures (from Abraham through the prophets),
God, as planned, is calling out a people from all nations (called), including
them under His covenant banner through belief in Jesus (justified), and tasking
them with reflecting His glory into the world (glorified).
Good! Thank you!
ReplyDelete