But He replied, “Why
were you looking for Me? Didn’t you know that I must be in My Father’s
house?” – Luke 2:49 (NET)
As one reads through
the Gospel of Luke, it is worthwhile and necessary to keep in mind the presumed
larger narrative purpose behind his writing. He begins his telling of the
story of Jesus with a declaration that he is going “to write an orderly
account” (1:3) of “the things that have been fulfilled among us (1:1). Quite
naturally (as is the case for the rest of the New Testament authors), Luke always
has the crucifixion and the Resurrection in view. That view of the Christ-event,
understandably and rightly (as it should for all believers as they view the
world), colors all that he writes and all of the material that he
presents.
The recipient of his
writing---the Roman official to whom Luke refers as “most excellent Theophilus”
(1:3), is not receiving new information from Luke. Rather, as seems to be indicated by the
phrasing employed by the author, Luke’s works serves as a confirmation of the
story, that Theophilus may “know for certain” (1:4) the things that he had been
taught. Presumably, Theophilus had been instructed concerning the
crucifixion and the Resurrection of Jesus (the main emphasis of the message of
the Gospel that Jesus is Lord). Thus, as
he reads, he is not being introduced to Jesus little by little, only to be met
with a surprise twist at the end of the story. It is necessary to
consider that what Theophilus already knows about Jesus (possibly as a believer
himself that seeks to share the story with others) is also going to influence
the way that he reads the story, with the seminal events of crucifixion and
Resurrection never being far from his thoughts.
So with a
consideration of these things concerning author and initial reader, it will be
useful and beneficial for any reader of Luke to also have the crucifixion and
Resurrection at the forefront of thought, influencing the reading of the text, which
thereby enables one to find those things influencing the telling of events and
stories throughout the whole of the writing, rather than only finding the
seminal events at the end of the book or only when Jesus speaks explicitly of
His pending death and what He hopes will be His Resurrection.
Because these things
are determinative of all things for the one who seeks to live a life marked by
allegiance to Jesus as King (the life of faith), it makes more than perfect
sense to be able to read the crucifixion and Resurrection, and even the rest of
the Gospel message that Jesus is King and Lord of all things, into the text
whenever possible, especially as one considers that it is the Gospel itself
(according to early believers such as Paul), and belief in such as reflected in
word and deed, that is itself somehow the saving and transformative power of the
Creator God. It would seem that Luke wants to aid his reader(s) in this
exercise.
To this end, this
study is going to take a closer look at the story of Jesus in the Temple.
This particular story occurs after what much be acknowledged to be a
significant chronological leap in the text, as it follows immediately upon that
section of Luke’s Gospel that is known as the “birth narrative.” In the
narrative that leads up to the story of Jesus in the Temple in Jerusalem, the
reader learns about the prophecy of John the Baptist’s birth, his father’s
(Zechariah) being unable to speak because he did not believe the words of the
angel Gabriel, and the announcement to Mary that she was going to give birth to
the Messiah.
It is worth pausing
and side-tracking here briefly here to make an interesting comparison and
contrast between Zechariah and Mary. When Zechariah hears the words of
Gabriel that informed him that his wife was going to give birth to a son, he
replies by saying “How can I be sure of this? For I am an old man, and my
wife is old as well” (1:18). Gabriel responds by saying, “because you did
not believe my words, which will be fulfilled in their time, you will be
silent, unable to speak, until the day these things take place” (1:20).
When Gabriel tells Mary “Listen: You will become pregnant and give birth to a
son, and you will name Him Jesus” (1:31), Mary responds with “How will this be,
since I have not had sexual relations with a man?” (1:34) Effectively, Zechariah
and Mary ask the same question, understandably relying upon the impossibility
of what they are said to be hearing. In response, Zechariah loses the
ability to speak, whereas Mary is given a positive affirmation and further
revelation from the angel.
No comments:
Post a Comment