Here it must also be
said that in Mark’s account in contrast to Matthew’s, rather than the withering
of the fig tree being bracketed by Jesus’ actions in the Temple and a return to
the Temple the following day in which He is challenged by the Temple
authorities, it is Jesus’ dramatic actions in the Temple and pronouncement of
judgment against it that is bracketed by the words spoken to the fig tree and
the words spoken about and prompted by the withered fig tree. It is then
that Mark writes “They came again to Jerusalem” (11:27a), with Jesus being
confronted with “By what authority are you doing these things? Or who
gave you the authority to do these things?”
(11:28)
So in Mark, the order
of events is the triumphal entry that is accompanied by a trip to the Temple
where Jesus merely looks around at everything (11:11), a departure to Bethany
for the night, words to the fig tree the following day, another trip to
Jerusalem and the Temple where He dramatically acts and speaks, another
departure from Jerusalem (presumably to Bethany again), the disciples noticing
the withered fig tree to which Jesus had spoken and doing so on the following
morning on their way back to Jerusalem (thus prompting the previously mentioned
commentary by Jesus), where Jesus makes another trip to the Temple.
By way of review and
contrast, Matthew has Jesus triumphally entering Jerusalem, acting and speaking
in the Temple, departing for Bethany, speaking to the fig tree which produces
an immediate withering and subsequent commentary on the fig tree, and an
entrance into Jerusalem and the Temple where He is challenged. Luke, by
way of further contrast, has Jesus entering Jerusalem (for which He weeps while
on His approach) and then speaking and acting in the Temple. He is a bit
more ambiguous in His timeline, as following Jesus’ recitation from Jeremiah he
writes that “Jesus was teaching daily in the Temple courts. The chief
priests and the experts in the law and the prominent leaders among the people
were seeking to assassinate Him, but they could not find a way to do it, for
all the people hung on His words. Now one day, as Jesus was teaching in
the Temple courts and proclaiming the gospel, the chief priests and experts in
the law with the elders came up and said to Him, ‘Tell us: By what authority
are you doing these things? Or who is it who gave you this authority?’”
(19:47-20:2)
All that follows from
the twenty-third verse of the twenty-first chapter of Matthew when Jesus
re-enters the Temple courts, until the first verse of the twenty-fourth chapter
when Jesus goes out of the Temple courts and walks away, occurs without a
change of scenery. The same is true of Mark, as the setting does not
change from the twenty-seventh verse of the eleventh chapter until the first verse
of chapter thirteen.
In Luke, the Temple
is the scene of the narrative from the first verse of chapter twenty to verse
thirty-seven of chapter twenty-one, which does not neatly change the setting,
but simply breaks-up the narrative by informing the listener that “every day
Jesus was teaching in the Temple courts, but at night He went and stayed on the
Mount of Olives” (21:37). For Luke, though Jesus embarks on His triumphal
entry from Bethany, He does not return there each evening. This helps to
explain his omission of the story of the fig tree and its withering, which
takes place in Matthew and Mark on the road from Bethany. Throughout this
entire section of the narrative, one must see and hear Jesus in the Temple
courts, which provides a dramatic backdrop for all of the words that He speaks,
along with the obviously Temple-related context for understanding His insistence
that no one knows the hour .
No comments:
Post a Comment