So though tongues are
a sign for unbelievers, in at least the ways that have been here discussed, it is
in this context that Paul has indicated that prophecy is for believers.
How and why is this so? It is because prophecy serves to strengthen the
church, which, by definition, are those that call Jesus Lord. It is those
that call Jesus Lord who constitute the church, and therefore it is they who
are the believers.
An unbeliever is not
a component of the church, so they are not necessarily going to be concerned
with making the Creator God’s kingdom present, though they may be physically
present in the assembly (attending a church service is distinct from being a
member of the entity that is understood as the body of Christ). The
activity of prophecy however, because all are encouraged to participate without
regard to position or status or honor (with no divisions at the table as
befitting the messianic banquet which the church is called to model), should
make a substantial impression on the unbeliever, which is something that will
be addressed by Paul.
The twenty-third
verse begins with “So if the whole church comes together and all speak in
tongues” (1 Corinthians 14:23a). Stopping right there, it must be said
that this would be quite the unusual event. It would be well outside the
normal range of religious experience to have the entire assembly of an
association demonstrating glossolalia. In the recorded history of this
type of activity, the ecstatic utterances associated with the idea of being
possessed by the spirit of a god, it was always a limited occurrence. As one
understands that honor was a limited good, and that honor would accrue to the
individual or individuals said to be employed by the god for communication that
was in need of interpretation, it is more than sensible that the activity would
be a limited to a select few individuals and would not occur prolifically or
haphazardly. Such a thing would be quite novel.
Now if speaking in
tongues was being used to create a spiritual hierarchy within the kingdom of the
covenant God, this makes it possible to easily comprehend why there may have
been a desire on the part of each person to engage in the practice, especially
if this was the very Creator God, who had inhabited physical form in the person
of Jesus of Nazareth, now speaking through another person by His Spirit.
If the Creator God
had taken human form in the person of His Messiah, and if that Messiah had been
resurrected from the dead and was being proclaimed as having received all power
and all authority as Lord of all, and if that God was now speaking through
another human by means of ecstatic utterances, then it is not at all difficult
to understand why an entire congregation would have wanted to be viewed as the
human vessel somehow inhabited by that God. If one thinks along these
lines, and if this way of thinking represents reasonable speculations, then one
is not left to wonder at the particular elevation of those that spoke in
tongues.
No comments:
Post a Comment