With the riot
conditions in Jerusalem, sparked by the thought that Paul may have taken a
Gentile into the Temple, having gotten the attention of the commanding officer
of the squadron of soldiers responsible for the security of the Temple area,
“He immediately took soldiers and centurions and ran down to the crowd” (Acts
21:32a). This crowd, which was about to experience the force of the Roman
military machine (all Gentiles, by the way), was clearly not eager to embrace
Gentiles as equal members of the covenant. This continues to reinforce
the world-altering (for a Jew) nature of the new covenant boundaries emphasized
by Jesus and preached by Paul.
In a way, this intervention
was fortunate for Paul, as “When they saw the commanding officer and the
soldiers, they stopped beating Paul” (21:32b). This is new information,
elaborating on the seizing and dragging of Paul. For his “crime,” Paul is
being beaten by the crowd. When Luke writes in verse thirty-one that they
were trying to kill Paul, it is more than just a way of expressing a strong
sentiment of anger or rage. They were beating Paul because they were
intent on killing him. Truly, the message he preached was revolutionary,
and it serves to explain some of the motivating factors behind the successful
effort that saw Jesus put to death at the hands of the Romans.
Paul was taken into
something resembling protective custody (which would be his lot for the
remainder of the record of his life as presented by Acts), as the commanding
officer sought to take measure of the situation. He inquired “who he was
and what he had done” (21:33b), and the crowd, still agitated by this supposed
usurpation of Israelite privilege and position, offered little help, as “some
in the crowd shouted one thing, and others something else” (21:34a). The
disturbance continued (the expansion of the covenant to encompass all peoples
being the greater and continuing disturbance, ironically) in such a way that
“Paul had to be carried by the soldiers because of the violence of the mob”
(21:35b). Indeed, “a crowd of people followed them, screaming ‘Away with
him!’” (21:36), in a scene terribly reminiscent of that which had been
experienced by Paul’s Lord.
Paul’s subsequent and
brief examination by this same commanding officer is an echo of the examination
of Jesus by Pilate. However, as Jesus remained largely silent, offering
very few words (according to Luke’s record of Jesus’ time before Pilate), Paul
is given and accepts the opportunity to speak to his accusers and to those that
are calling for his death, having been prevented from carrying out that
intention themselves.
As Paul spoke, the
crowd appears to have listened patiently. Undoubtedly, this was owing to
multiple factors. The first factor is that “he addressed them in Aramaic”
(21:40b). Luke informs the audience of as much, writing “When they heard
that he was addressing them in Aramaic, they became even quieter” (22:2a).
Having quieted the crowd, the second factor comes into play, as Paul begins
offering them certain assurances that effectively relieves them of the fear
that he would have taken a Gentile into the Temple.
No comments:
Post a Comment