Then, with the honor
and shame constructs in mind, and with a profound reflection upon the Jesus
tradition as he well understood it, Paul adds: “Instead, God has blended together
the body” (1 Corinthians 12:24b)--- noting the flattening out and removal of the
kingdom-of-God-obstructing divisions within the congregation and going on to
read “giving greater honor to the lesser member” (12:24c). This would certainly call to mind the portion
of the shared Jesus tradition that would eventually come to be
well-communicated by Luke, who reports Jesus as having said, in conjunction
with the parable of the great banquet, “For everyone who exalts himself will be
humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted” (14:11).
There, it is
worthwhile to reflect on the fact that Luke’s precise construction has Jesus
saying such things in the wake of His insistence concerning the kingdom of the
Creator God (in the context of Jesus’ talk that reflects His understanding of
the messianic banquet), that “some are last who will be first, and some who are
first will be last” (13:30). All of this, for Paul, is reflected in his
own insistence “that there may be no division in the body, but the members may
have mutual concern for one another” (12:25).
To that he adds “If one member suffers, everyone suffers with it.
If a member is honored, all rejoice with it” (12:26).
Capping off his
dissertation concerning the body that simply must be carefully regarded along
with the eating and drinking, Paul goes on to write “Now you are Christ’s body,
and each of you is a member of it” (12:27). He has made clear his point
that the distinctions being set forth by the church in Corinth, which were so
unfortunately on display when they gathered together for the meal that they were
erroneously referring to as the Lord’s Supper, were all artificial and counter
to what Jesus intended because of the divisions and apparent spiritual honor
competition. As has been said, this was a source of some distress for
Paul, as it served to undermine the unifying, gathering message of the Gospel
(Jesus is Lord of all), as amply pronounced through Jesus’ life and
words.
However, Paul does go
on to point out that there are actually going to be some types of divisions in
the church, writing that “God has placed in the church first apostles, second
prophets, third teachers, then miracles, gifts of healing, helps, gifts of
leadership, different kinds of tongues” (12:28). While he does this, he
does it while having already told them that “It is one and the same Spirit,
distributing as He decides to each person” (12:11a), while also having made it
very clear what he thinks about putting divisions and hierarchies on display at
their corporate meals in a way that allows honor to be accrued by one member at
the expense of another (honor being a limited good). So the last thing
that he would expect them to do is to take this list of what “God has placed in
the church,” and use it to create a spiritual hierarchy that will then be
reflected in their table fellowship, so that their gathering looks no different
from any other meal gathering of the time. This will only create a
competition for status based on a new set of honor securing
instruments---spiritual gifts---that will be used to create the same types of unhelpful
social and cultural divisions of which the church of Christ is to have no
part.
If read properly, keeping in mind the
sense of narrative and structure that Paul has labored hard to develop, these
questions will be heard in light of Paul’s insistence that all of the members
of the body (as he speaks to this particular stratifying and dividing church)
are equally valuable, with a reminder that “those members that seem to be
weaker are essential, and those members we consider less honorable we clothe
with greater honor, and our un-presentable members are clothed with dignity”
(12:22-23). The questions are also heard according to the statement that
“God has blended together the body, giving greater honor to the lesser member,
so that there may be no division in the body, but the members may have mutual
concern for one another” (12:24b-25).
No comments:
Post a Comment