Why mention the
Temple here and in connection with John’s conception of love? It has to
be mentioned because the presence of the Creator God among His covenant people,
with Jesus understood to be serving as the Temple (especially in the light of
the fact that at the time of these writings the Temple of Jerusalem no longer
existed), signaled the end of exile. The Creator God’s presence meant
that exodus was at hand and that the new age of His rule on earth had
begun.
The Creator God’s
personal presence in the Temple was the sign that Israel was free from its
oppressors. A new and glorious Temple (“the glory of the one and only,
full of grace and truth---John 1:14b) would cause a hearer or reader to hearken
back to the construction of the first Temple, under the reign of Solomon, when
Israel’s glory was believed to have reached its full height and extent, and all
nations came streaming to Israel and to Solomon, paying homage and
tribute. This could be understood to be
a component of the Isaianic vision of the messianic banquet (shared by Luke and
seemingly embraced by Jesus Himself), which itself was a marker of the Creator
God’s love for the whole of His creation.
This could also call
attention to what is to be found in Ezra and the story of the establishment of
the second Temple, in that those that had seen the glory of the first Temple
wept. If this situation of glory in relation to the Temple was again in
effect (and the language suggests such thoughts), then the messianic age---the
kingdom age---had dawned in and with Jesus.
Consequently, the remainder of the narrative, including the notion of
the love modeled by Jesus, which was to be meted out to and in and for the
world by Jesus’ disciples, must be heard as echoes of that fact. Jesus’
words and actions can then be understood within that context, as they serve to
reveal the love of the Creator God while providing the model for love for one
another that will be what marks out the fact of the presence of the kingdom of
the Creator God on earth that was inaugurated commensurate with all that was
included in the life and mission of the One understood as the incarnated
Word.
In light of all of
this, it will be the concrete activities of Jesus, as reported within John,
that identify what is to be the lived-out love of the Christian
community. Therefore, the first instance of Jesus’ activity, apart from
Him coming to be baptized at the hands of His forerunner, is the call to follow
Him. Surely, the greatest example of love to be expressed between the
Christ’s disciples is the ongoing encouragement to follow Jesus and submit to
Him as the Lord of all. Of course, the idea of what it means to follow
Jesus (and therefore love in the way that He loves---which is the way that God
loves) must be rounded out and given its full orb through the procession of the
presentation of His life, which is precisely the path of John’s
narrative.
Jesus first calls men
to follow Him in the very the first chapter of John, as He answers a question
posed to Him by two of John the Baptist’s disciples in regards to where He was
lodging with a simple “Come and you will see” (1:39a). In the forty-third
verse, Jesus speaks to Philip and says “Follow me.” These disciples will
go on to learn about what it will mean to follow Him, as He reveals to them the
kingdom of His God through His own proximate functioning as the Temple, which
will also be the experience of those that hear or read this Gospel
record. To that end, the first chapter of John closes with Him telling
these newly minted disciples: “I tell all of you the solemn truth---you will
see heaven opened and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of
Man” (1:51).
These words, with the
use of “Son of Man” language, are likely designed to evidence messianic and
therefore kingdom of Creator God sensibilities while building on the Temple
language previously used, while also causing the informed hearer to think of
Genesis and “Jacob’s ladder.” In that story, following the vision of his
dream in which angels were going up and down on the ladder or stairway
(depending on the translation), Jacob exclaimed, among other things, that “This
is nothing else than the house of God” (28:17b), thus prompting him to name the
place “Bethel” (house of God). By using these words, the author makes
clear the fact that Jesus is presenting Himself as the Temple (Bethel – the
house of God), thus defining Himself to these would-be disciples as the locus
of the Creator God’s activity and as the ordering principle of the life of the
covenant people. All of this serves to prepare for seeing Jesus as the
Creator God in the flesh, and by extension, the outworking of the love of the
Creator God that is to be the model for living life in the way of Jesus.
No comments:
Post a Comment