The second chapter of
John begins with the story of Jesus and His disciples attending a wedding feast
in Cana. John’s report of Jesus’ actions at this wedding feast continue
to aid in defining love on John’s terms. There is not the space here to
go into great detail (see the study entitled “Water Into Wine”), but when Jesus
turns the water into wine, thus providing the best wine to those who are going
to be served towards the end of the feast, He is making it possible for those
at the lower end of the societal spectrum (less honorable) to enjoy something
better than those at the higher end of society (the more honorable). With
his actions there, He provides an illustration of the last becoming first while
the first become last, and in so doing teaches His disciples about preferring
others, while also demonstrating what it will look like when the kingdom of the
Creator God is present among them.
In the fourth chapter
of John, one encounters the story of Jesus and His conversation with a Samaritan
woman. This was taken to be a highly unusual event. It is written
that Jesus, while passing through Samaria, which was a customary practice of a
Jew, “was tired from the journey” (4:6b), so He sat down next to a well. The
author reports that this well was known as “Jacob’s well” 4:6a), and that it
was “near the plot of land that Jacob had given to his son Joseph”
(4:5b). Because these are not haphazard presentations, but calculated
theological treatises, mention of a well, along with mentions of Jacob and Joseph,
are clearly designed to cause the listener or the reader to reflect upon the
patriarchs of Israel (and indeed Israel’s self-defining historical narrative).
It is unsurprising to find this to be the case, as there has already been a
reflection back to Jacob at the close of the first chapter (“heaven opened and
the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man”).
This talk of Jacob’s
well is John’s Gospel is significant. Without going into an exhaustive
recounting of all of the instances in which they are to be found, let it be
said that wells are a rather prominent feature of the Genesis narrative. Wells
are found in association with the stories of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Of course, the words that open this Gospel account, “In the beginning” (1:1a), indicate
that the author intends the Genesis narrative to lie consistently in the
background as the story unfolds. Beyond Genesis, wells are mentioned in
connection with men such as David and Samson, among others, so it only seems
natural that the story of Jesus would also include a story about a well.
In addition to such
thoughts, a cursory glance at the narrative itself demonstrates that the
treatise of John is deeply rooted in the history of Israel---giving it a
historical depth, which is a consideration that should weigh on the mind of the
audience that, in the end, the author indeed intends to convey a message about
a man that actually lived, actually died, actually rose again, and is still, by
the presence of His Spirit, alive, well, and an abiding force within and for
this world.
This historical
rooting is amplified when taking note of the fact that questions about John the
Baptist are couched within concerns related to the prophet Elijah. Along
with that, Israel’s history is called upon in the encounter between Jesus and
Nicodemus in the third chapter, as Jesus mentions Moses and alludes to Israel’s
time in the wilderness following the exodus (which plays right into the exile
and exodus theme that is found in John 3:16’s statement that contrasts
perishing and eternal life). So even though John offers up a very
different type of historical narrative than that to which the modern reader may
be accustomed, it is worth noting that the narrative is not to be looked upon
as being ahistorical.
No comments:
Post a Comment