Though it is not
mentioned in Mark or Luke, the notion of Jesus’ coming, as it frames the
discourse on offer by Jesus and influences the way that Matthew’s twenty-fourth
chapter is read and perceived, is something with which any study of this topic
also must deal. Much as one tends to hear “end of the age” in the light
of “end of the world” sensibilities, there is also a tendency to hear speech
about the coming of Jesus in terms of His coming to earth from heaven. This
is a natural inclination because of reading that takes place post-ascension,
and because, being inhabitants of this world whereas Jesus is off in heaven
somewhere, any talk of Jesus’ coming must be talk of Him coming from heaven to
earth.
Now before even
addressing the issue, as best as is possible from the mindset of a first
century Jew, one must look at this issue as a matter of common sense.
When Jesus speaks in terms of not being seen until He comes, He is alive and
kicking. He is there. He has not gone anywhere. Remember, these
things demand to be heard in their narratival context. Though Jesus has
made mention of His death and Resurrection, such as is found in the seventeenth
chapter of Matthew when He says “The Son of Man is going to be betrayed into
the hands of men. They will kill Him, and on the third day He will be
raised” (17:22b-23a), this isn’t exactly something that is clearly understood
by His disciples. In fact, Matthew says “they became greatly distressed”
(17:23b). Prior to that, in the sixteenth chapter, when Jesus says
something similar, “Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him”
(16:22a).
So then, returning to
the realm of common sense, since Jesus is with them when He says these
things---He has not been crucified or resurrected and He has not ascended into
heaven (though this written record does come after all of these things have
taken place), one simply cannot have the disciples presuming these things as
part of their query. Such would be
absurd. While the hearers heard it and readers read it with knowledge of
these things, the narrative does not push the audience of the story to hear the
disciples’ question as post-earthly-life-and-ministry of Jesus.
Yes, this can become
convoluted and confusing, but it is incumbent upon on an erstwhile reader of
Scripture to best attempt to inhabit the story as it is on offer, positioning oneself
to hear Jesus live and in person, as one of His disciples. Doing that, one
is then not posing a question to Jesus about His coming, and doing so from a
post-ascension perspective that has Jesus coming back to earth. That
would merely gets things out of order. At this point, as far as His
disciples are concerned and from their perspective, Jesus is with them and Jesus
is not going anywhere. Thus any talk of His
coming cannot be about His coming to earth.
There must be an altogether different point of reference.
Yes, He’s talked
about His coming death and resurrection, but one cannot force the disciples to
have already come to terms with what those words truly meant. In fact,
this is where Luke provides a wonderful glimpse into the mindset of the
disciples of Jesus through His Emmaus-road presentation in chapter twenty-four
of His gospel. There, downhearted and dejected disciples, who were
clearly struggling to cope with Jesus’ death and what it meant, say “we had
hoped that He was the one who was going to redeem Israel” (24:21a).
Not only was there no
expectation of a resurrection, though Jesus has been reported to have spoken in
advance of His being raised, there was certainly no hope or expectation of an
ascension, and there was obviously no prevailing ideology that had Jesus
returning to earth from heaven after an unexpected crucifixion, unexpected resurrection,
and unexpected ascension. As far as those Emmaus road disciples knew, Jesus
was dead. So in terms of rightly dealing with Matthew’s narrative, the
movement of the story does not allow for a reader or the disciples themselves
injecting a hoped-for return of Jesus to earth into their question about His
coming. It simply does not fit.
No comments:
Post a Comment