“So the king and all the members of his royal court set out
on foot” (2 Samuel 15:16a). This is Israel’s exodus from Egypt, but
applied in reverse. It is the oppressive king that is fleeing, rather
than the people. This is the king of Israel, who represents the people,
going into exile rather than leading them to and then in their promised
land. David, whether directly or indirectly, through the situation that
he created by not dealing with Amnon, and by not dealing with Absalom, is
delivering the people that are loyal to him into exile. Their march is
not one of exodus, in power and glory, but rather one of fear and shame.
Not all of the members of the royal household left Jerusalem however, as “the
king left behind ten concubines to attend to the palace” (15:16b). This
becomes significant later on, as this allows for the fulfillment of a “prophecy”
that had previously been given to David.
Like Israel, but again in reverse,
“The king and all the people set out on foot, pausing at a spot some distance
away” (15:17). This should cause a reflection upon Israel’s flight from
Egypt, in that they paused at the Red Sea, and then again at the mountain of
God. It should also serve as a contrast to what it is that is happening
with the two events. Drawing attention to the fact that he knew that he
was going into exile, “the king said to Ittai the Gittie, ‘Why should you come
with us? Go back and stay with the new king, for you are a foreigner and
an exile from your own country… Today should I make you wander around by going
with us?’” (15:19,20b)
David asks Ittai, who already lives in a state of exile, why
he wants to continue in exile. H then
uses the language of wandering, which present thoughts of Israel’s wandering in
the wilderness after their faithless response to the call to enter the land of
promise. Ittai, however, refused to leave David, saying “As surely as the
Lord lives and as my lord the king lives, wherever my lord the king is, whether
dead or alive, there I will be as well!” (15:21) Clearly, not all is lost
for David. This response from Ittai seems to boost David’s spirits a
bit. Perhaps he began to think that if this man would not forsake him,
then perhaps the Lord God of Israel had not completely forsaken him either.
One must take note of a
startling fact. That fact is that the first mention of the Lord God of
Israel in relation to David’s situation and in the midst of Absalom’s
insurrection, comes from this foreigner Ittai who is living in exile. It
seems that David had forgotten about his Lord. To make the point, the
author does not have David mentioning his Lord since the twenty-second verse of
chapter twelve, as he does so in connection with the death of the child that
was born to he and Bathsheba. As one can be sure that these books of Samuel
are both historical and theological treatises, this mention of Israel’s God by
Ittai is quite striking. It seems to jar something within David.
After this reminder of the Lord,
it is said that “All the land was weeping loudly as all these people were leaving.
As the king was crossing over the Kidron valley, all the people were leaving on
the road that leads to the desert” (15:23). This is understandable.
Jerusalem, after all, is the capital of the country. Many that lived
there would have served the king in official government positions. With
David fleeing and a new king on the way, it would not be unreasonable for these
people to believe themselves, at the least, as out of a job, and at the worst as
liable to be put to death by Absalom so that he can appoint his own people into
government positions---people that he can trust to be loyal to him and to serve
him well. Along with that, “Zadok and all the Levites who were with him
were carrying the Ark of the Covenant of God” (15:24a). For some reason,
they were taking the Ark of the Covenant with them, as if somehow it was only
David that could legitimate its presence there in Jerusalem, rather than the
other way around, with the Ark serving to legitimate the rule of the Creator God’s
people by its presence near the throne.
No comments:
Post a Comment