David, it would seem,
could not muster such feelings towards Absalom. David was not this kind
of father. Perhaps Absalom hoped he could be so? “When someone approached
to bow before him” (2 Samuel 15:5a), he did not treat that person as his own
father had rather disdainfully treated him, without acknowledging the righteous
behavior of his son that had prompted the exile that had now been brought to
something like exodus.
Rather, “Absalom
would extend his hand and embrace him and kiss him” (15:5b), no doubt
recounting the tale of his appearance before the king, the lack of the
extension of a loving and compassionate hand, and the absence of a loving
embrace. Without those things, the kiss could be positioned as little
more than an insult---a customary and expected greeting that one might even
offer to an enemy, if that enemy ever happened to reach the place of
bowing.
“Absalom acted this
way toward everyone in Israel who came to the king for justice” (15:6a).
They were coming to the king for justice and Absalom made sure that they
received so much more. He gave them himself. “In this way Absalom
won the loyalty of the citizens of Israel” (15:6b). They were going over
to the side of the son that had been exiled simply because he had attempted to
defend his sister’s honor (within an honor and shame society) by punishing an
evildoer.
Yes, Absalom was even
willing to raise his hand against his own brother in the defense of
righteousness and in response to shameful acts. In the eyes of the
people, that was probably to his credit. Accordingly, he was going to be
their Moses, who had been raised in the royal house of Egypt but was willing to
take an Egyptian life if necessary. Just as Moses had killed for the sake
of the honor of his countrymen and was forced to flee to the wilderness, so too
had Absalom acted, at least it could be seen as such in the eyes of the people
that were becomingly increasingly loyal to him.
It is possible that
the people of Israel were coming to believe in his exile, Absalom had obviously
met Israel’s God, and the people experienced the obvious result of his meeting
of their God when they experienced his warmth, his handshake, his embrace, and
his kiss. His return to Jerusalem was a mirror of Moses’ return to Egypt,
and accordingly he was there to lead the people of the Creator God. To
this end, for Absalom and his supporters, David had become the new
Pharaoh---oppressing the people of God just as he had oppressed his very own
son---and he was rightfully going to be removed from his place of authority.
As before, Absalom
was patient. He had waited two years from the rape of his sister before
acting on her behalf. He had spent three years living apart from his
people, in Geshur. He had spent two years in Jerusalem, living apart from
the face of the king. “After four years” of winning the loyalty of the
people “Absalom said to the king, ‘Let me go and repay my vow that I made to
the Lord while I was in Hebron. For I made this vow when I was living in
Geshur in Aram: “If the Lord really does allow me to return to Jerusalem, I
will serve the Lord”’” (15:7-8).
One cannot help but notice
the similarities to Moses’ encounter with Pharaoh. Moses, upon his return
to Egypt from a long time of exile (remembering that in the case of Absalom it
has now been eleven years since Tamar was raped, which was the catalyst to all
of these events), went to Pharaoh and spoke to him of letting Israel go into
the wilderness to make a sacrifice to the Lord. How does David respond to
a similar plea from Absalom? “The king replied to him, ‘Go in peace.’
So Absalom got up and went to Hebron” (15:9).
Can the Moses/Pharaoh
analogy be here continued? Absolutely it can, as it was when Pharaoh’s
power had been completely broken that he eventually gave the command for Israel
to go up out of the land to sacrifice. Absalom, if he was indeed
positioning himself as a new Moses and casting his father in the position of
Pharaoh (and ruling the Creator God’s people unjustly), would use this to
further his ongoing campaign to cement the validity of his own leadership in
the eyes of the people.
He had been enduring
his father’s disdainful treatment long enough. He had spent years gaining
the hearts of the people. This has all been well-calculated. He had
built his grassroots support and his coup was effectively rooted in the grand
story of Israel’s flight from Egypt and their God’s conquering of those that
had become enemies of the people of the Creator God. Yes, Absalom was
attempting to lead his own exodus, and with his departure to Hebron, the place
where his father had initially been crowned and ruled, that effort had now
begun.
No comments:
Post a Comment