When the second
tabernacle was built, that being Solomon’s temple, these curtains can be found
again, though obviously larger and more elaborate than those that had been made
for the tabernacle of the wilderness. Though it is not mentioned in the
descriptions of the temple in the first book of the King, when one moves to the
continuing narrative (a purposeful, condensed version of the books of Samuel
and the Kings) of the nation of Israel as presented in the second book of the
Chronicles, it is found that Solomon “made the curtain out of violet, purple,
crimson, and white fabrics” (3:14a).
When the temple is
rebuilt following the return of Judah from Babylon, as chronicled in the latter
historical books, a detailed description of what was made for it, done in it,
and placed in it, is not provided.
However, what is provided in the account of its rebuilding and
dedication, is that those who saw the second temple, if they had seen the first
temple before it suffered destruction at the hands of the Babylonian forces,
wept.
It is said that they
wept, not only because the second temple paled in comparison to the first
temple, but also because of what it did not contain, which was, among other
things, the Ark of the Covenant and their Lord’s Shekinah (the presence of the
Creator God of Israel, represented by a cloud filling the sanctuary, as had
reportedly been the case with both the tabernacle and the first temple).
However, though it lacked these things, and lacked specifically that which was
hidden by the veil, one can be assured that the second temple contained a
curtain of division from the Most Holy Place similar to the first temple, which
had been based on the pattern of the veil of the tabernacle.
This temple was the
same temple that would eventually come to be re-furbished and expanded by Herod
the Great, which was the temple in which the veil was rent upon the death of
the Christ. As part of his building program, Herod the Great had sought
to restore the temple to its original splendor. This restoration,
undoubtedly, would have included the creation of a veil that would have rivaled
the beauty and majesty of the veil that had been crafted for Solomon’s
temple.
As one continues to make
progress through the Hebrew Scriptures, there is another temple to be
discovered. This temple (now the fourth to be referenced in the course of
the compiled story of Israel --- tabernacle, first temple, rebuilt temple) is
what is known as “Ezekiel’s Temple.” This temple, one notes with great
interest, has no veil of separation from the Most Holy Place. Though
Ezekiel’s temple differs from the others in many ways, this is probably one of
the more significant differences. No mistake is made when it is insisted
that the veil is an important feature of the temple. Therefore, the absence of a veil much be
considered to be an important feature as well.
The veil of the
temple is part of the consciousness of the covenant people. So much so that in the ninth chapter of Hebrews,
the author mentions the curtain that separated the Holy Place from the Most
Holy Place, speaking specifically of the tabernacle in this case, though his
audience could have easily connected it with the veil of the two temples, while
also, as a believing community of Jesus-followers, remembering the purported tearing
of the veil that was said to have occurred upon the death of Jesus. Further
demonstrating his understanding of the significance and importance of the veil
as it pertains to the way in which the Creator God is to be understood and approached,
he also writes about the fact that the high priest could only enter behind that
veil but once a year, with the blood that he offers for himself and for the
sins of the people committed in ignorance (Hebrews 9:7).
Thank you for bringing up this topic. I am fascinated to see where you take us.
ReplyDeleteJonathan