As one progresses
through the eighth chapter of John, the final day of the feast is reached. It is that day on which it is said that “Jesus
stood up and shouted out, ‘If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me, and let
the one who believes in Me drink. Just as the Scripture says, “From
within Him will flow rivers of living water”’” (7:37b-38). With these
words, Jesus quotes prophecies (and calls to mind entire sections of the
writings as they are set within Israel’s historical narrative) from Isaiah and
Zechariah that would have been considered to be unmistakably messianic in
nature, as they were connected to God’s redemptive actions on behalf of His
people.
Accordingly, because
of the messianic overtones of the pronouncements, along with what was known
about Jesus, and the generalized expectation of a long-hoped-for divine
intervention on behalf of His people, “When they heard these words, some of the
crowd began to say, ‘This really is the prophet!’ Others said, ‘This is
the Christ!’ But still others said, ‘No, for the Christ doesn’t come from
Galilee, does He?’” (7:40-41) The record of this particular Gospel
indicates that it was words like these, with their clear messianic
underpinnings combined with Jesus’ seeming reluctance to conform to messianic
ideals or to solicit the support of the rulers of the people, that prompted the
chief priests and Pharisees to want to seize Jesus with the intention of
putting Him to death. In addition, it seems that, for them, this issue of
Jesus’ place of origin was a sticking point. With that piece of
information alone, believing themselves to be fully cognizant of the full story
when it came to Jesus place of birth and residence, His opponents seized on
this piece of information.
From there, the
reader/hearer of the Johannine Gospel will go on to read about Nicodemus, who
first made an appearance in the third chapter of John. Nicodemus, who had
obviously become a believer (probably owing to his interactions with Jesus),
defends Jesus, saying “Our law doesn’t condemn a man unless it first hears from
him and learns what he is doing, does it?” (7:51). The response offered to
this was “You aren’t from Galilee too, are you? Investigate carefully and
you will see that no prophet comes from Galilee!” (7:52) There was a
relative certainty amongst those that were taken to be learned in these things
that the Messiah would not spring from that region, which brings us to our main
point, and the fact that, with the elimination of the story of the woman caught
in adultery, it is immediately following these words that the author has Jesus
diffusing the entire “Galilee issue” by saying, “I am the light of the
world. The one who follows Me will never walk in darkness, but will have
the light of life” (8:12). How so?
Turning to Matthew
(while acknowledging that John does not depend on Matthew, and that the two
authors, or authorial communities, had different purposes for the story of
Jesus that they told (though we could certainly expect the sweep of the Jesus
tradition to have been in the mind of all of the authors, especially John,
which is taken to have come last of the four Gospels), we find him quoting from
Isaiah in regards to Jesus and the fulfillment of messianic hopes as he writes,
“Galilee of the Gentiles---the people who sit in darkness have seen a great
light, and on those who sit in the region and shadow of death a light has
dawned” (4:15b-16). To “Galilee of the Gentiles” and the associated
“great light,” could be added Simeon’s prophecy that is recorded in the second
chapter of Luke, in which he calls the Messiah “a light, for revelation to the
Gentiles, and for glory to Your people Israel” (2:32).
Thus, considering the
passage in John again, while a believer is certainly likely to confess a
certain knowledge that Jesus is the light and hope of the world, Jesus’ words concerning
light in this context, provided further context by talk of Galilee, were pronounced with a clear, prophetic and
historical referent. Thus, this was not simply a spiritual saying as it
is so often taken to be, and it is not to be disconnected from the very
realistic situation that Jesus was addressing. By saying what He said, Jesus
should be understood to have been making it clear that He was, in fact, the
Messiah.
No comments:
Post a Comment